Search options (Page 33 of 41)

Neat, I'm especially surprised you managed to balance the volume between the sampled drums and the tone channels.
I'm still pretty bad at reading other people's code, so I'll need a bit of time to really dig into the code.

Also noticed there are some UI changes... got any plans with that, or is it just changes in SDL?

Tadaa, here we are again with our popular series "Fixing the quattropic converter". In this episode, expert C++ coder utz will try a completely rewritten, all-new algorithm for determining the play mode! Be sure to have a good laugh at the latest bugs!

Download is still here: https://github.com/utz82/ZX-Spectrum-1- … p?raw=true

Very interesting and pleasant sound! Wavetables are nice and good, but this is something that's uniquely 1-bit/beeper sounding while at the same time moving forward in terms of technique. Would definately use an engine with this.

sigh it's a curse with this engine, or rather with the converter. In theory the demo tune should be unchanged, so it's probably the converter causing the trouble. I'll look into it. Thanks for reporting, in any case.

Thanks guys! Btw I made quick video detailing some of the new features, check it out:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKfni5-_42g

Regarding a potential new tracker, I just remembered an old idea I had when 1tracker came out.

The main disadvantage of the pattern-less approach in 1tracker is that with increasing song length, moving around in the song, keeping track of what is what, and changing large portions of the sequence becomes tedious and demands a lot of attention. So, how to solve this?

My idea is to have an additional visual representation of the sequence - not unlike the Beepola pattern sequence in terms of layout, but translated to the marker concept in 1tracker. Each section (ie. block of song data defined by two markers) will be numbered, and shows up as a block in the sequence layout. This is fluid, ie. when a marker is removed, the sequence view changes accordingly (numbering should stay to avoid confusion). Perhaps there should also be the possibility to name sections, or assign a color to them, for those structures the user decides to keep permanently.

Now, obviously this wouldn't quite work like a traditional pattern matrix, ie. blocks can't be used multiple times. But it would still offer several possibilities to the user:

- clicking on a block will move you to the according position in the song data.
- drag blocks to move them around in the sequence. Multiple consecutive blocks can be selected with Shift+Click.
- Clone one or several consecutive blocks by marking source blocks with Ctrl-Click, then right-click at the desired position to insert the clone.
- Cut sections by marking them like above, then Del. Freed up section numbers may be re-used by the auto-numbering.

Well, just some random ideas here. I have neither the time nor the skills to actually program something like this.

Damn, what an ordeal! Does this also happen if you try to transfer via command line ("tilp ti82 Silverlink ht2.82p")?

Thx. Sent you a mail.

Neat! But yeah, definately needs more votes. Also yes, I think e.g. a lot of stuff from BotB is still missing. Unfortunately I don't have enough time to sift through and convert those entries atm. I think it would be really helpful if there was a conversion tool which would make the process a bit less time-consuming. Perhaps you could get in touch with puke7 from BotB to see if it's possible to utilize meta-data from BotB somehow?

In any case, I've added a link in the forum header, hope that'll help to generate a few clicks

Yeah, the usual problems... hope the site will be back up in a few days.

I'm afraid no. Could you post the console output with the ticalcs error? I'll try to pester the TiLP developer if I can't spot anything obvious.

Another option: Try the latest TiLP beta, perhaps there were some relevant bugfixes. See here: https://www.cemetech.net/forum/viewtopi … 917#244917