<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[The 1-Bit Forum — new engine: BuzzKickASS!]]></title>
		<link>http://randomflux.info/1bit/viewtopic.php?id=398</link>
		<atom:link href="https://randomflux.info/1bit/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=398&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in new engine: BuzzKickASS!.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 May 2025 09:23:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: new engine: BuzzKickASS!]]></title>
			<link>http://randomflux.info/1bit/viewtopic.php?pid=3230#p3230</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Halleluja! That&#039;s a fantastic upgrade. Joffa Smith would be proud if he could hear this.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (utz)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2025 09:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://randomflux.info/1bit/viewtopic.php?pid=3230#p3230</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: new engine: BuzzKickASS!]]></title>
			<link>http://randomflux.info/1bit/viewtopic.php?pid=3229#p3229</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It is not too late to downgrade the sample rate back, or I can add an option. I also thought to hook up the Ear Shaver EX sample drums code, but decided it makes the engines much similar. So I attempted to tweak up the existing code, thinking that a higher sample rate would allow for better hi-hat sounds.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Shiru)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 18:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://randomflux.info/1bit/viewtopic.php?pid=3229#p3229</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: new engine: BuzzKickASS!]]></title>
			<link>http://randomflux.info/1bit/viewtopic.php?pid=3228#p3228</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Great news. Thanks Shiru. I&#039;ve been using buzzkick a lot recently, mainly for the small file size and cool drums.</p><p>Like the volume control and vibrato on this new version, which sound great.<br />Must admit I do prefer the drums sample rate on the original version though.</p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3sWJl_lPUeE?feature=shared">https://youtu.be/3sWJl_lPUeE?feature=shared</a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (AtariTufty)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 18:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://randomflux.info/1bit/viewtopic.php?pid=3228#p3228</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[new engine: BuzzKickASS!]]></title>
			<link>http://randomflux.info/1bit/viewtopic.php?pid=3227#p3227</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>About time to update the old boring BuzzKick with new exciting features!</p><p>- Envelope attack/decay modes<br />- Direct volume control<br />- Vibrato/modulation<br />- Portamento to note<br />- Doubled sample rate for drums<br />- Lots of detuning<br />- 1tracker support</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Shiru)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 16:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://randomflux.info/1bit/viewtopic.php?pid=3227#p3227</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
